Your entire presentation is littered with logical fallacies and devoid of any evidence, proof or facts to support your allegations. A few examples:
"The state has long been trying to replace God with government." - No evidence of this is presented here.
..."this attempt by government officials to replace God with an all-powerful government. From where do you make this conclusion?
"God is the creator of everything, including science." No evidence to support this absurd statement.
"The trouble comes when man thinks that he is smarter or morally superior to God." Exactly who claims they are "smarter or morally superior to" something that does not exist?
..."you start to realize that science actually validates the existence of God", please provide some documentation to prove it.
"You can make valid arguments for God and creation by referencing some of the most basic scientific theories," please, cite me a few examples.
Too bad you didn't bring real examples, intellect and factual points to the conversation.
Here is a truth you should ponder:
Like all religions, the Holy Religion of the Invisible Pink Unicorn is based upon both Logic and Faith. We have Faith that She is Pink; we Logically know that She is Invisible, because we can't see Her.
I’ve seen the Case for Christ. With all the Christians that Joe Rogan has had on recently, I think he should have Strobel on his podcast. Joe Is a lot closer to Faith than he was years ago. I think at best, Joe probably considers himself agnostic now as opposed to a straight up atheist. He seems more open.
Your entire presentation is littered with logical fallacies and devoid of any evidence, proof or facts to support your allegations. A few examples:
"The state has long been trying to replace God with government." - No evidence of this is presented here.
..."this attempt by government officials to replace God with an all-powerful government. From where do you make this conclusion?
"God is the creator of everything, including science." No evidence to support this absurd statement.
"The trouble comes when man thinks that he is smarter or morally superior to God." Exactly who claims they are "smarter or morally superior to" something that does not exist?
..."you start to realize that science actually validates the existence of God", please provide some documentation to prove it.
"You can make valid arguments for God and creation by referencing some of the most basic scientific theories," please, cite me a few examples.
Too bad you didn't bring real examples, intellect and factual points to the conversation.
Here is a truth you should ponder:
Like all religions, the Holy Religion of the Invisible Pink Unicorn is based upon both Logic and Faith. We have Faith that She is Pink; we Logically know that She is Invisible, because we can't see Her.
Try The Case for Christ by Lee Strobel. Also, if the author added all the items that you requested, the piece would be much longer.
Finally many people, who I promise are smarter than you and me, are believers in God. Just some food for thought.
I’ve seen the Case for Christ. With all the Christians that Joe Rogan has had on recently, I think he should have Strobel on his podcast. Joe Is a lot closer to Faith than he was years ago. I think at best, Joe probably considers himself agnostic now as opposed to a straight up atheist. He seems more open.